Exempla docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident

Authors

  • Leone Gazziero CNRS - Université de Lille

Keywords:

Aristotle, Sophistici elenchi, Fallacy of accident, Fallacy of consequent, Byzantine and Latin doxography

Abstract

Scholarly dissatisfaction with Aristotle’s fallacy of accident has traditionally focused on his examples, whose compatibility with the fallacy’s definition has been doubted time and again. Besides a unified account of the fallacy of accident itself, the paper provides a formalized analysis of its several examples in Aristotle’s Sophistici elenchi. The most problematic instances are dealt with by means of an internal reconstruction of their features as conveyed by Aristotle’s text and an extensive survey of their interpretation in the Byzantine and Latin exegetical tradition. Carefully handled a doxographical approach, as opposed to rapid results oriented practices, proves to be most effective in that it supplies both useful albeit ordinarily overlooked insights and a comprehensive framework of reference for further investigations.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2015

How to Cite

Gazziero, Leone. “Exempla Docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident”. Acta Philosophica 24, no. 2 (September 30, 2015): 333–354. Accessed March 4, 2024. https://www.actaphilosophica.it/article/view/3803.

Issue

Section

Studies